Discussion of:
'Twilight' review
After years away, 17-year-old Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) returns home to the small town of Forks, Washington to live with her father, Charlie (Bi...
ironcheffer from los angeles - December 08, 2008 at 2:24 PM
This movies whack.. i don't know what the big deal is
Report This CommentJohnThom from Greenville and upstate - December 01, 2008 at 9:50 AM
pretty cool a vampire flick is getting this much attention. I've had friends tell me the very popular series of books are ready written for the chick flick genre. Not that that's bad, it's just not my cup of tea. I didn't care for the last Undersowrld movie either. 'Twilight' seems to be a 'watered down' vampire story with the usual vampire cliche's and debinked vampire cliche's from the reviews and thumbing through the book while waiting on my car to be serviced. I'd like to see it. to determine if my prejudices are correct.
Report This Comment
liltamby5 from Los Angeles - November 21, 2008 at 3:03 PM
As a huge fan of the book, I knew the movie wasn't going to be nearly as good...so I guess I can't say I was disappointed. But over all, it was just okay. The acting was a bit cheesy in some scenes (but that's only natural with amateur actors). But hey, at least we still have the books! :)
Report This CommentAdd a comment
Please log in to comment
Most viewed Movie items in the last 24 hours
- 15 breakout actors of the decade
- Top 10 cult movies of the decade
- 10 sexy sci-fi space babes
- 'Avatar' review
- 'Avatar' photos
What other people are saying...